Upload a scorecard PDF or edit the values to see the shortest path to the next incentive tier. Months remaining and per-measure difficulty shape the plan. Patients with multiple open care gaps are not yet factored in; that requires full claims data.
Load a scorecard PDF PARSE BETA
Rubric: 40%=$2, 55%=$3, 65%=$4, 70%=$5, 80%=$6 PMPM. Ranking weights each measure by difficulty, capture likelihood, and whether it is still reachable with the months remaining.
Dollars unlocked at each tier
Return on effort, by pay tier
Recommended Path to Incentive Tier Achievement
Numerator / denominator / target drive whether a measure is met. Effort = patients to flip. Edit type and difficulty on the Matrix tab. Then Recompute.
High-Value Patients
| Rank | Patient | Attributed PCP | Open gaps | Near-win gaps | Measures within reach | Value score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A. Alvarez | Dr. Smith | 4 | 3 | Statin use (SUPD), Med adherence HTN, Asthma ratio | 97 |
| 2 | J. Okafor | Dr. Smith | 3 | 2 | Cervical screening, Med adherence diabetes | 89 |
| 3 | R. Nguyen | Dr. Reyes | 4 | 2 | Chlamydia screening, Diabetes eye exam | 84 |
| 4 | D. Cohen | Dr. Smith | 2 | 2 | Med adherence cholesterol, Statin therapy (SPC) | 80 |
| 5 | S. Boateng | Dr. Kane | 3 | 1 | Breast cancer screening | 72 |
| 6 | M. Rossi | Dr. Reyes | 2 | 1 | Cervical screening | 66 |
| 7 | T. Ahmed | Dr. Kane | 3 | 1 | A1c control | 61 |
| 8 | L. Park | Dr. Smith | 2 | 1 | Annual wellness visit, Diabetes eye exam | 58 |
| 9 | K. Silva | Dr. Reyes | 2 | 0 | Colorectal screening | 44 |
| 10 | B. Toure | Dr. Kane | 1 | 1 | Med adherence HTN | 41 |
Measure Difficulty Matrix
Difficulty is 1 (easy, one-time, provider-controlled) to 5 (hard, sustained, patient-dependent or systemic). It and the category feed the fastest-path ranking. Edit any value and it recomputes.
What this tool does
It reads a value-based care performance scorecard and lays out the shortest, most realistic route to the next incentive tier. It ranks the open measures by how much effort each takes, how likely you are to actually close it, and whether there is still time to close it this measurement year.
How the scorecard is scored
Each scored measure is worth one point. Completion percent is points met divided by the number of scored measures (measures with no eligible patients are excluded). That completion percent maps to a per-member-per-month (PMPM) incentive tier:
Below 40% pays $0. 40% pays $2 PMPM, 55% pays $3, 65% pays $4, 70% pays $5, and 80% or above pays $6.
The base incentive equals the PMPM rate times the panel's annual member months, and it only pays once completion clears the 40% floor. Two things stack on top: a $50 bonus for every completed annual wellness visit and annual physical (which also turns on at 40%, and pays on visits already done), and the fee-for-service professional fee for any new visits performed. Higher tiers can also carry engagement and network-integrity bonuses.
How the fastest path is chosen
Crossing a pay threshold is where the money is, so the tool finds the fewest, most reliable measures needed to reach the next tier and orders them by value per unit of real effort. It accounts for direct payment (visits pay their own way through FFS and the bonus) and for the value of the point that tips you across a threshold.
Why measures are not equal
Each measure has a category and a 1-to-5 difficulty rating that adjust its effort and the likelihood of closing it:
Binary (screenings, visits): a one-time, provider-controlled action. Easiest and reliably closable at any point in the year.
Control (statin therapy, A1c, blood pressure): requires reaching a clinical target. Moderate difficulty and partly time-sensitive.
Adherence (medication PDC, asthma ratio): requires a patient to stay adherent across the whole year. Hardest to guarantee and the most time-sensitive.
Utilization (ED visits, readmissions, admissions, transitions): population rates moved through care management, not by a countable set of patients. Shown as n/a for patients-to-win.
Why timing matters
Adherence and control measures have a point of no return: once too much of the measurement year has passed, a patient can no longer reach the annual threshold no matter the effort, while a screening stays closable until year end. The "months left in the year" setting (driven by the scorecard period) discounts the confidence on time-sensitive measures as the year runs down, and flags any that can no longer be recovered this cycle along with the realistic completion ceiling that results.
Reading the columns
Patients to win: additional compliant patients needed to flip a measure to met (n/a for utilization).
Confidence: the chance of actually capturing the measure this year, from its difficulty and the months remaining.
Running: cumulative points and completion percent after that step. The colored rows mark the moment a pay tier is crossed.
Data notes and limits
A year-end scorecard describes a closed year and is not actionable for that year; use it as the baseline to plan the next one. For live work, load the most recent quarterly scorecard and set the matching period. All dollar figures are planning estimates; confirm PMPM rates, the visit bonus, and fee-for-service amounts against the practice's actual contract. The model treats each measure as one equal point and counts each measure's patients independently, so it does not yet credit a single patient who closes several measures at once.
Model: 1 point per scored measure; completion % = points / scored measures. Base incentive = PMPM x member months, gated at 40%. The $50 visit bonus pays on all completed AWVs + physicals once completion clears 40%. FFS is professional fee on newly completed visits. Difficulty, capture likelihood, and months-remaining adjust the recommended order and flag points that are hard or no longer reachable this year. Estimates; confirm against the practice's contract.